Is the practice of psychology a scientific anti-semitism?

A clinical psychologist has been arguing with me on Facebook because he likes my posts but wants me to understand that it is deviant behavior to argue any point. Apparently almost no one does this anymore. One of the points he keeps making involves his casual (he's quite friendly) anti-semitism, as he claims that Jews are often argumentative. He wonders if this is because of a disease or genetic deficit.

Of course, that Jews are excessively intellectualizing or argumentative (and that that is a bad thing to do or be) is a common anti-semitic trope, and that their deviance is caused by biology (genetics or disease, and so motivating either correctional treatment or social and physical exclusion), was a belief that formed part of the racial anti-semitism that was eventually taken up by the Third Reich. What is interesting is not that there are people who think this way, but that their thinking seems 'normal' and is in fact authorized by their institutional employments and professional disciplines.

Now this 'friend' makes claims that some people's behavior just is objectionable, and this is not only observable, it is measurable by methods of 'science'. So I note:

In some professional practice that makes use of one of the "behavioral sciences," like psychology, a person is authorized to say that they (1) observe people's behavior, (2) "know" that some behaviors are "objectionable," (3) these judgments are "true" because observed and (4) measurable, by means of (5) "scientific" methods of measuring observed behaviors. (6) The methods and presuppositions of this "science" are never interrogated, but only given. (7) The value judgment that some behaviors are wrong and others right is never established nor argued for; it is merely assumed.( 8 ) The practice is both "evidence-driven" therefore and (9) "results-driven" because the practice is a technique aimed at getting the persons who are here being managed to change their behaviors in order to (10) do what the managers/bosses want them to do -- which, from the point of view of the persons subject to this treatment, means (11) doing what they are told (this is called "compliance").

Of course, what the persons being subjected to this correctional managerial treatment will be expected to have their behavior modified so that they do are: (1) Do their job and perform whatever tasks in life are 'assigned' to them by social institutions and expectations (job, school, family, etc.), (2) do it with contentment, since discontent of any kind is, like maladaptation, presumed to be disease, (3) 'have no problems' or exhibit no 'dysfunctional' behaviors. (This, in sum, is what all 'mental health' workers do.).